LINKED DATA AND NANOPUBLICATIONS IN GLAM CONTEXTS
A METHODOLOGICAL WORKFLOW
Keywords:
linked data, operational ontology, nanopublication, GLAM, semantic interoperabilityAbstract
Galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAM) deal with heterogeneous collections described through different systems, spreadsheets, catalogues, vocabularies, and institutional practices. This diversity hinders the integration, interoperability, retrieval, traceability, and reuse of cultural data. In this context, linked data, operational ontologies, and nanopublications can contribute to structuring, connecting, querying, and publishing cultural information in a more interoperable and verifiable way. The objective of this article is to present a methodological workflow to guide the semantic representation, connection, retrieval, and publication of data in GLAM contexts, articulating data preparation, conceptual modeling, controlled vocabularies, operational ontologies, semantic alignment, RDF graphs, SPARQL queries, and nanopublications. The proposal was developed based on five methodological reference approaches: Ontology Development 101, OntoForInfoScience, Linked Open Terms, Linked Data for Libraries, Archives and Museums, and SABiOx. Methodologically, this is an applied, exploratory, and propositional study, resulting in a workflow organized into five analytical blocks, 11 layers, and 32 stages. The workflow is being tested in a master’s-level course in Information Science, but the article is not configured as a completed experience report. It concludes that the main contribution of the proposal lies in integrating ontology development, linked data practices in GLAM, and the granular publication of assertions with provenance, offering a concise and documented methodological path applicable both to small experimental subsets and to incremental initiatives for the semantic organization of cultural data.
References
AGUIAR, Camila Zachhé; SOUZA, Vítor E. Silva. SABiOx: the extended systematic approach for building ontologies. In: SEMINAR ON ONTOLOGY RESEARCH IN BRAZIL (ONTOBRAS), 17., 2024, Vitória. Anais [...]. Aachen: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024. 13 p. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, v. 3905). Disponível em: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3905/paper1.pdf. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
BAADER, Franz; MCGUINNESS, Deborah L.; NARDI, Daniele; PATEL-SCHNEIDER, Peter F. The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Disponível em: https://courses.cs.umbc.edu/graduate/691/fall17/01/papers/DescriptionLogicHandbook.pdf. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
BERNERS-LEE, Tim. Linked data. [S. l.]: W3C, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
BERNERS-LEE, Tim; HENDLER, James; LASSILA, Ora. The semantic web. Scientific American, New York, v. 284, n. 5, p. 28-37, 2001.
BIZER, Christian; HEATH, Tom; BERNERS-LEE, Tim. Linked data: the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Hershey, v. 5, n. 3, p. 1-22, 2009. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009081901. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026
CIDOC CRM SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP. CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CIDOC CRM): version 7.1.3. [S. l.]: CIDOC CRM SIG, 2024. Disponível em: https://cidoc-crm.org/Version/version-7.1.3. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
DOERR, Martin. The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, Menlo Park, v. 24, n. 3, p. 75-92, 2003. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/958671.958678. Acesso 7 nov. 2026.
FALBO, Ricardo de Almeida. SABiO: systematic approach for building ontologies. In: JOINT WORKSHOP ONTO.COM/ODISE ON ONTOLOGIES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 1., 2014, Rio de Janeiro. Anais [...]. Aachen: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2014. p. 1-14. Disponível em: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1301/ontocomodise2014_2.pdf. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
GROTH, Paul; GIBSON, Andrew; VELTEROP, Jan. The anatomy of a nanopublication. Information Services and Use, Amsterdam, v. 30, n. 1-2, p. 51-56, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2010-0613. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
GRUBER, Thomas R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, London, v. 5, n. 2, p. 199-220, 1993. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
GUIZZARDI, Giancarlo. Ontology, ontologies and the “I” of FAIR. Data Intelligence, Cambridge, v. 2, n. 1-2, p. 181-191, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00040. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
GUIZZARDI, Giancarlo; WAGNER, Gerd; ALMEIDA, João Paulo Andrade; GUIZZARDI, Renata S.S. Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) story. Applied Ontology, Amsterdam, v. 10, n. 3-4, p. 259-271, 2015. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3233/AO-150157. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches: traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, Bingley, v. 58, n. 4, p. 422-462, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
HOOLAND, Seth van; VERBORGH, Ruben. Linked data for libraries, archives and museums: how to clean, link and publish your metadata. London: Facet Publishing, 2014.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION; INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION. ISO/IEC 21838-2:2021: information technology: top-level ontologies (TLO): part 2: Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Geneva: ISO, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
ISAAC, Antoine; SUMMERS, Ed. SKOS simple knowledge organization system primer. [S. l.]: W3C, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
KNUBLAUCH, Holger; KONTOKOSTAS, Dimitris. Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL). [S. l.]: W3C, 2017. W3C Recommendation. Disponível em: https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
KUHN, Tobias; DUMONTIER, Michel. Trusty URIs: verifiable, immutable, and permanent digital artifacts for linked data. In: EXTENDED SEMANTIC WEB CONFERENCE (ESWC), 11., 2014, [S. l.]. The semantic web: trends and challenges. Cham: Springer, 2014. p. 395-410. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_27. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_27. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
LEBO, Timothy; SAHOO, Satya; MCGUINNESS, Deborah. PROV-O: the PROV ontology. [S. l.]: W3C, 2013. W3C Recommendation. Disponível em: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
MCCOMB, Dave. Data centric revolution: is a knowledge ontology the missing link? TDAN.com, [s. l.], 7 jun. 2023. Disponível em: https://tdan.com/data-centric-revolution-is-knowledge-ontology-the-missing-link/30790. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
MENDONÇA, Fabricio; ALMEIDA, Mauricio Barcellos. OntoForInfoScience: a detailed methodology for construction of ontologies and its application in the blood domain. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends, Marília, v. 10, n. 1, p. 12-19, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2016.v10n1.02.p12. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
NOY, Natalya F.; MCGUINNESS, Deborah L. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford: Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, 2001. Disponível em: https://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
POVEDA-VILLALÓN, María. Linked Open Terms (LOT). [S. l.]: [s. n.], 2018. Disponível em: https://lot.linkeddata.es/. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
RILEY, Jenn. Understanding metadata: what is metadata, and what is it for? A primer. Baltimore: NISO, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.niso.org/publications/understanding-metadata-2017. Acesso em: 29 maio 2026.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Guia de gestão de dados de pesquisa para bibliotecários e pesquisadores. Rio de Janeiro: CNEN, 2015.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Nanopublicações: abordagens de representação do conhecimento como inovação para a comunicação científica. Informação & Informação, Londrina, v. 29, n. 4, p. 247-266, 2024. DOI: 10.5433/1981-8920.2024v29n4p247. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/51883. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
STUDER, Rudi; BENJAMINS, V. Richard; FENSEL, Dieter. Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, Amsterdam, v. 25, n. 1-2, p. 161-197, 1998. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
WANG, Richard Y.; STRONG, Diane M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, Armonk, v. 12, n. 4, p. 5-33, 1996. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2026.
WILKINSON, Mark D.; DUMONTIER, Michel; AALBEERSBERG, Ijsbrand; APPLETON, Gabrielle et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, London, v. 3, art. 160018, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.
ZENG, Marcia Lei. Interoperability. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 46, n. 2, p. 122-146, 2019. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-2-122. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2026.
ZENG, Marcia Lei. Knowledge organization systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 160-182, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/ko/35/2-3/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-160. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2026.