SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AS AN OBJECT OF DISCURSIVE CONTESTATION IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH
AN ANALYTICAL-CONCEPTUAL APPROACH
Keywords:
public health, scientific literature, public policy, scientific evidenceAbstract
Scientific evidence provides a foundation for decision-making and the formulation of
public health policies and can be understood as the outcome of systematic processes of inquiry. This study aimed to analyze how the concept of scientific evidence is constructed and mobilized in official statements issued by the current U.S. administration, seeking to identify its
characteristics, attributes, and conceptual relationships. A qualitative, exploratory, and
descriptive study was conducted, drawing on documentary research and Ingetraut Dahlberg’s
concept-analytical method. The corpus comprised 20 official White House documents retrieved using the term “scientific evidence.” The analytical categories included the legitimation of science, institutional delegitimation, politicization of science, strategic selection of evidence, construction of authority, and scientific nationalism. NotebookLM was used as a tool for data processing and categorization. The findings show that the documents associate scientific evidence with transparency, objectivity, reproducibility, and freedom from ideology, while simultaneously linking it to notions of “common sense,” national sovereignty, and individual freedom. A simultaneous process of legitimation and delegitimation of scientific authority was
identified: certain scientific consensuses and institutions are challenged through accusations of politicization and bureaucratization, while other forms of knowledge and authority are legitimized. The study concludes that the concept of scientific evidence is reconfigured within the political context analyzed through the selective attribution of characteristics and conceptual relationships that establish criteria for the legitimacy, authority, and validation of knowledge, with implications for contemporary disputes surrounding scientific information and public health policy.